According to @OnchainLens, a whale or institution moved 6.2M LDO worth approximately 3.6M dollars to Binance after 1 to 2 years of dormancy, implying an unrealized loss of about 6.26M dollars versus a 9.86M dollar cost basis sourced from an Anchorage Digital custodian wallet; one reported address is 0x4df669c19a622c6980f5634e2a1d771d626dee09 (source: @OnchainLens). According to Glassnode research, large exchange inflows frequently coincide with higher sell side liquidity, making such whale deposits a tactically bearish signal that traders often monitor in the short term for LDO order books and liquidity depth (source: Glassnode). According to CryptoQuant, tracking exchange reserves and subsequent on-chain outflows helps assess whether inflows convert into actual selling, so traders can watch LDO exchange balances and spot volumes on Binance for confirmation or invalidation of sell pressure risk (source: CryptoQuant).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, LINK addresses 0x2635cE00D186934bCcc2E62db5784569434c57BF and 0x6B750Cf2308678042206dbd1f0084ecF49Db36db, likely controlled by one whale, accumulated 417,000 LINK at an average entry of $22.71 between Dec 2024 and Feb 2025. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence address pages for 0x2635cE00D186934bCcc2E62db5784569434c57BF and 0x6B750Cf2308678042206dbd1f0084ecF49Db36db. According to @ai_9684xtpa, after roughly 10 months, 376,000 LINK was routed via an intermediary and deposited to Binance; if sold against the reported cost basis, the realized loss would be about $3.99M. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence transaction and address data.

According to @lookonchain, a wallet it flags as potentially linked to Fenbushi Capital deposited 10,400 ETH worth about $29.88M into Binance roughly 10 hours prior to the post. Source: Lookonchain on X, Nov 26, 2025, twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1993496004986126396. The address 0x027750420d3F4DD56F558871792b1632A21c6205 and the exchange-bound transfer are viewable on Arkham Intelligence, confirming the on-chain movement to an exchange venue. Source: Arkham Intelligence explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x027750420d3F4DD56F558871792b1632A21c6205. Traders tracking ETH liquidity can monitor this address and subsequent Binance inflows in real time via Lookonchain alerts and Arkham Intelligence to assess follow-on market activity. Source: Lookonchain on X; Arkham Intelligence explorer.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited $32.1 million USDC into HyperLiquid to increase exposure to HYPE on November 25, 2025. According to @OnchainLens, the address now holds 741,318 HYPE valued at $24.63 million. According to @OnchainLens, the same entity also opened a HYPE short position with 10x leverage on HyperLiquid. Based on @OnchainLens figures, the reported valuation implies an indicative reference price of roughly $33.2 per HYPE at the time of the snapshot.

According to @OnchainLens, World Liberty Finance deposited 40.59M TRX (valued at ~$11.25M) into HTX on Nov 25, 2025, with the on-chain address 0x5be9a4959308a0d0c7bc0870e319314d8d957dbb cited and data sourced from Nansen. According to @OnchainLens, the entity acquired these TRX for ~$9.84M, implying an average cost around $0.242 per TRX and an unrealized profit near $1.4M (~14.3%) at a reference value of roughly $0.277, based on figures shared from Nansen.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the WLFI Strategic Reserve wallet deposited 40.68 million TRX to HTX in batches about 10 hours ago, worth approximately $11.23 million; the purpose of the deposit is undisclosed, source: @ai_9684xtpa. The same source reports the wallet bought roughly 40.17 million TRX about 10 months ago at an average price of $0.2415, totaling about $9.85 million, source: @ai_9684xtpa. Prior tokens from the WLFI bundle (LINK, AAVE, ENA, MOVE, ONDO) were previously deposited to Coinbase with a stated intention of asset reallocation rather than selling; this marks the first observed deposit to HTX by this wallet, sources: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence wallet address 0x5be9a4959308A0D0c7bC0870E319314d8D957dBB.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a wallet attributed to BlackRock deposited 4,198 BTC (about $348M) and 43,237 ETH (about $117M) into a Coinbase address, with the address shared by the source here: https://t.co/aA9IA7R8Cj on Nov 21, 2025; source: https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1991837606821466314. According to @OnchainDataNerd, the post identifies the transfers as deposits to a centralized exchange address and does not confirm any subsequent selling or order execution; source: https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1991837606821466314. According to @OnchainDataNerd, the combined transfer value is roughly $465M based on the source’s USD estimates for BTC and ETH at the time of posting; source: https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1991837606821466314.

According to @OnchainLens, BlackRock deposited 4,198 BTC valued at $348.3M and 43,237 ETH valued at $117.33M into Coinbase on Nov 21, 2025, based on tagged on-chain transfers, source: @OnchainLens. The sending entity is labeled BlackRock on Arkham Intelligence’s explorer, which corroborates the attribution and the destination wallet cluster tied to Coinbase, source: Arkham Intelligence. The combined transfer value is approximately $465.6M derived from the figures reported, providing a sizable exchange inflow signal that traders track for potential order book and liquidity impacts on BTC and ETH, source: @OnchainLens; Arkham Intelligence.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x3136 deposited 512,440 UNI worth $3.64M to Binance after nearly five years of holding, described as a capitulation with a realized loss of $11.64M (-76%) (source: @lookonchain on X, Nov 20, 2025; Arkham Intelligence explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x3136ED252D6EC340C7D2fb1285C15aDD1fd4e0fA). The same wallet had previously withdrawn 512,440 UNI from Binance in April 2021 at an average price of $29.83, valued at $15.28M at that time (source: @lookonchain on X, Nov 20, 2025). Based on these figures, the implied transfer price is approximately $7.11 per UNI ($3.64M/512,440), providing traders a reference level for the whale’s exit on Binance (source: calculation from @lookonchain-reported amounts on X, Nov 20, 2025). The on-chain movement increases exchange-available UNI on Binance by 512,440 tokens, which can be monitored via the Arkham Intelligence address page (source: Arkham Intelligence explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x3136ED252D6EC340C7D2fb1285C15aDD1fd4e0fA; @lookonchain on X, Nov 20, 2025).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, whale address 0x313 deposited 512.34k UNI (approximately $3.64M) to Binance about 10 minutes ago (source: @OnchainDataNerd, Nov 20, 2025). According to @OnchainDataNerd, the address accumulated these UNI around five years ago at a total cost of $15.29M with an average entry price of $29.84 (source: @OnchainDataNerd). According to @OnchainDataNerd, if the entire amount were sold at the current price, the realized loss would be about $11.65M, reflecting an ROI of -76% (source: @OnchainDataNerd).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 512,440 UNI worth about $3.64M into Binance after holding the tokens for 5 years, based on Nansen on-chain data (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen, the same address 0x3136ED252D6EC340C7D2fb1285C15aDD1fd4e0fA initially withdrew these UNI from Binance at a valuation of $15.34M and is currently down roughly $11.7M on the position (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). Per @OnchainLens using Nansen data, this transfer places 512,440 UNI on Binance, increasing on-exchange supply by that amount (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, Amber deposited 5.3M STRK (about $971k) to Binance roughly 2 hours ago and 6.3M STRK (about $1.47M) three days earlier when STRK reached an 8-month high, with the flows traceable via Arkham Intelligence explorer addresses 0xD839CEDfA0De601cdDeBa94BE366e952BeA21177 and 0x6268aD6fF54cD2b57d527b2d3F873E23060bc2eD (source: @OnchainDataNerd; Arkham Intelligence explorer). Based on these reported figures, total recent deposits linked to Amber amount to 11.6M STRK sent into Binance (source: @OnchainDataNerd).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 3,000 ETH worth $9.53M to Binance after 1.5 months, facing a $6.92M loss, source: Onchain Lens, data: Nansen. The address 0xD81a248c2C0Effa5FC223a90e2b72B3Eaf4DA486 initially withdrew 6,947 ETH for $29M and still holds 3,947 ETH worth $12.54M, source: Onchain Lens, data: Nansen. These on-chain flows provide concrete exchange inflow size and remaining balance that traders can monitor for liquidity developments, source: Onchain Lens, data: Nansen.

According to @OnchainLens, Owen Gunden transferred 2,401 BTC, approximately 244.96 million USD, into Kraken about three hours ago and still holds 2,499 BTC valued around 258.58 million USD, source: @OnchainLens on X referencing Arkham Intelligence. Large on-chain BTC deposits to centralized exchanges are monitored as potential immediate supply on spot venues by professional traders, source: Glassnode Academy, Exchange Inflows and Outflows. Traders can track Kraken BTC net inflows, spot order book depth, and funding or basis shifts to assess whether this transfer converts into actual sell pressure, source: Kaiko market microstructure research 2024 and @OnchainLens on X.

According to @OnchainLens, Owen Gunden deposited 450 BTC (approximately $45.7M) to Kraken and still holds 4,900 BTC (about $500M). Source: Onchain Lens on X (Nov 13, 2025). Arkham Intelligence’s entity page for Owen Gunden attributes the relevant addresses and displays remaining holdings consistent with these figures. Source: Arkham Intelligence (intel.arkm.com). Large holder transfers to centralized exchanges are closely monitored as potential sell-side liquidity events, so short-term traders often track Kraken BTC netflows and order book depth after such deposits. Source: Glassnode Research; CryptoQuant analytics.

According to @OnchainLens, on-chain data show Owen Gunden deposited 700 BTC worth about $73.23M to Kraken, while his labeled wallets still hold 5,350 BTC valued near $558.82M. Source: Onchain Lens on X, Nov 11, 2025; ARKM Intel Owen Gunden entity. A transfer to a centralized exchange makes those coins available for immediate order book trading, and historical research links net exchange inflows with higher near-term sell-side liquidity and volatility. Source: Glassnode Insights exchange flow reports 2020–2023; CryptoQuant Research on exchange netflows. Traders tracking BTC can monitor Kraken spot order books and on-chain netflow dashboards for follow-through from this wallet cluster, as identifiable exchange inflows often precede elevated intraday volumes across venues via arbitrage. Source: Kaiko market microstructure reports 2022–2024.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 500 BTC valued at approximately $52.8 million into Gate after holding for four months, with activity tied to address bc1p9sdhnsryqz6hkmkrmgw0nyy9agtdaqd9fxd648g26pkn5aptj6kssks582; source: @OnchainLens on X, Nov 11, 2025. The same address previously withdrew the 500 BTC at an estimated value of $59.4 million, implying a reported realized loss of $6.85 million on the round trip; source: @OnchainLens on X, Nov 11, 2025. Based on the reported figures, the movement reflects roughly an 11.5% drawdown and a net exchange inflow of 500 BTC to Gate; source: @OnchainLens on X, Nov 11, 2025. The implied average entry was about $118,800 per BTC versus an implied current deposit valuation near $105,600 per BTC, derived from the amounts reported; source: @OnchainLens on X, Nov 11, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, a whale deposited 1.71M UNI (about $15M) accumulated between Feb 4 and Oct 12 into Binance, with Arkham Intelligence explorer addresses 0x4c6452F18D5967F1f7e9884BC5cDFC60452E015A and 0x3300eebeEA8239b90a435e403B130a853A0d7DfF cited as on-chain evidence (source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence). Selling the full position at current prices would realize an estimated $1.45M loss versus the acquisition cost, per @lookonchain (source: @lookonchain).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale or institution deposited 1.19M UNI worth $10.54M to Binance while incurring a $914K loss, based on Nansen data. According to @OnchainLens, the wallet 0x4c6452F18D5967F1f7e9884BC5cDFC60452E015A accumulated the UNI from Binance and Flowdesk between Feb 5, 2025, and Oct 12, 2025 for a total cost of $11.45M, citing Nansen data. According to @OnchainLens using Nansen figures, the estimated average acquisition cost is about $9.62 per UNI versus an implied deposit value near $8.86 per UNI.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, Jump Trading received 100M WLFI (about $15.4M) from a WLFI_team wallet within the past hour, source: @OnchainDataNerd. The same entity deposited 18.4M WLFI (about $2.9M) to Binance roughly 30 minutes ago, source: @OnchainDataNerd. Based on those figures, the Binance deposit equals 18.4% of the received WLFI, indicating an increase in immediately tradable supply on Binance order books, source: @OnchainDataNerd and Binance. The involved address is tagged as Jump Trading on Arkham Intelligence at intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/jump-trading, source: Arkham Intelligence.